On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Simone Piccardi <picca...@truelite.it> wrote: >> Some people like to know explicitly which versions of particular >> > Understood, but what I was trying to tell is that given the current > kernel development model talking about 3.0 tell nothing, that's a > particular version. > > As 3.1 is just another one, and so on. You plan to change the reference > all time a new kernel version is released?
Ah, I 'corrected' the addendum to 3.x. The rest of the objectives stated 3.x kernels (not 3.0). I know it doesn't address your concern directly. However, I know that if I remove all version information, LPI'll be constantly asked which versions of the kernel are covered. > That's the reason I'm not convinced about using a version, because > knowing/explaining what's the meaning of the kernel versions now is what > should be required for both candidates and courseware. And that would be a legitimate question to ask; ie. what does the difference in the number of kernel versions mean. Regards, -- G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
