On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Anselm Lingnau
<anselm.lingnau+exam...@linupfront.de> wrote:
> I think that the objective list should focus on stating succinctly what
> candidates are expected to know for the exam – no more, no less. Trying to
> make it into a course syllabus/agenda would probably only make it worse as far
> as its original purpose is concerned, while the resulting agenda would still
> leave a lot of room for disagreement and be certain to not please everybody.
> Specifying an official order would also clash with LPI's stated philosophy of
> not stipulating how people are actually supposed to prepare for the exam.
So on this note...I've put up a sample 'chapter' for the LPIC-2 Body
of Knowledge that I mentioned a couple of months ago.
With the caveat that this is intended as a Body of Knowledge (ie. a
compendium of the Linux knowledge sought by a LPI candidate), would
anyone and everyone like to take a look and tear it apart? :)
My aim is to structure this document with minimal prose, only
essential graphics, and "just the facts." I'm trying to very clearly
make it _not_ study material. In fact, one of its main goals is to
serve as reference material to courseware developers.
I'm looking for suggestions on what is missing, what isn't missing
(but should be) and general feedback on the formatting.
Oh, and, here's the link:
http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-2_BoK_Content_206.1_Make_and_install_programs_from_source
Regards,
--
G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org> gpg id: EF9AAD20
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
