On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Marc Baudoin <[email protected]> wrote: > Topic 207.1 says: "This objective includes the ability to convert > older BIND configuration files to newer format", without other > indication. Does it mean from BIND 4 to BIND 8/9? BIND 8 and the > new named.conf format have been around for 15 years, BIND 4 is > considered dead, dead, dead. Shouldn't this sentence be removed?
It's dropped. There is a small change to make from bind 8->9 (or was it bind 9-> newer 9?) but that's in the zone file. > Topic 207.2 says: "Candidates should be able to create a zone > file for a forward or reverse zone or root level server". Is the > "or root level server" really necessary? Unless I'm mistaken, > not everybody manages a root server... check the rewording. I think it makes it more explicit that you're managing root server hints. Regards, -- G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
