Le 06/11/2013 10:41, G. Matthew Rice a écrit : > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Éric Deschamps <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't think this should be a problem but I was suprised to discover >> that the weigt of LPI201v4 is not 60. Is it right? > > > Hi Eric, > > Where are you seeing this? The 'official' reference is here: > > wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-2_Objectives > > It keeps adding up to 60...even with: > > matt@abbott:~$ (echo 0;curl -s wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-2_Objectives > | sed -n 's/.*id="20[0-6]\...*weight: \([0-9]\+\).*/\1+/p';echo p)|dc > 60 > matt@abbott:~$ > > It's an ugly line but it's late and at least my laptop is agreeing with me :) > > Regards, >
Ooops, looks like I forgot one point in 203.*. Sorry! Regards, Éric _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
