Il 22/02/2016 20:43, Anselm Lingnau ha scritto: > kenn...@floss.cat wrote: > >> My support for munin as easy & nice-looking capacity planning + Icinga >> (as nagios successor) for monitoring. > > We can probably bikeshed this until the cows come home. > I completely agree on this, and because the topic is capacity planning, what I'd like is not a switch to another solution instead of collectd. What I'd like is to avoid any question about a specific monitoring tool inside the test.
I have no answer about which way we can assess specific knowledge in this area. Just because there are many possible valid solutions (also if I doubt that collectd is between them) it's impossible to test all of them, while choosing a specific one is just wrong. I agree that RRD is the only common part we can concentrate on, but it seems too much for this argument. My suggestion was asking about requisites for monitoring, and what to monitor and, perhaps, an high level feature comparison. I don't think is right to put in the test any specific question about any specific monitor tool. Simone -- Simone Piccardi Truelite Srl picca...@truelite.it (email/jabber) Via Monferrato, 6 Tel. +39-347-1032433 50142 Firenze http://www.truelite.it Tel. +39-055-7879597 Fax. +39-055-7333336 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
