Perhaps you have a point - its seems that LPI is is a gravitational tug between different applications on Linux - perhaps the tracks should be split into two directions:
1. Cloud Native. This assumes that you are building your application and services on Linux to run on cloud services from the start--not porting or migrating existing services. Things such as specific methods for deploying tools/servicesfor ephemeral services--such as ELK (Elasticache, Logstash, Kibana), ZFS usage, CEPH (large filesystems), HA Proxy for Load Balancing, Redis deployments. Continuous Integration/Software Pipeline features and concepts. Focus on Linux providing Services 2. A legacy or small (10 and under) track (not to sound pejorative) There are different ways to build and supporting systems which could focus on things closer to Linux and not related to application monitoring... This would deal with local features such as mysqldump, rsyslog, various local technologies you would use on Linux. Focus on the Linux Server. 3. Each of the above tracks would have a standard core of Linux tools, Path, Permission, Dependencies, etc, etc, (LPI 1) What is your opinion? take care Jeremy Hajek Industry Associate Professor of Information Technology and Management https://appliedtech.iit.edu/people/jeremy-hajek https://github.com/jhajek/Linux-text-book-part-1 On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:00 AM, <lpi-examdev-requ...@lpi.org> wrote: > Send lpi-examdev mailing list submissions to > lpi-examdev@lpi.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > lpi-examdev-requ...@lpi.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > lpi-examdev-ow...@lpi.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lpi-examdev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. LPI Exam and Certification Development Survey 2016 > (Fabian Thorns) > 2. Re: LPI Exam and Certification Development Survey 2016 > (Kenneth Peiruza) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 20:01:41 +0200 > From: Fabian Thorns <ftho...@lpi.org> > Subject: [lpi-examdev] LPI Exam and Certification Development Survey > 2016 > To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <lpi-disc...@lpi.org>, > "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <lpi-examdev@lpi.org> > Cc: Kevin Glendenning <kglendenn...@lpi.org> > Message-ID: > < > cabeahcjxayk-gz+8fufc-eyb79wu4a1xbfeirgydiyu+ej+...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Dear LPI Community, > > In the townhall meetings held recently, the question of LPI's role in an > evolving technical world was raised. During the last months we had > numerous discussions with people at Open Source events asking them for what > they do in their jobs, how they expect to change them in the future and > how, in their opinion, LPI should deal with such developments. > > First of all, I would like to thank those of you who already shared their > thoughts with us. Especially those of you who provided valuable feedback on > expectations LPI could meet better than we do today. Based on the feedback > we?ve received so far, we would like to further clarify the expectations > people have of LPI. Therefore, we created an online survey that covers the > aspects mentioned most often in consultations. The survey is anonymous and > should take about 15 to 20 minutes. It is open for participation until > April 30th, 2016. > > You can find the survey at > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/3CN7WG9 > > With your participation, you will provide LPI with valuable feedback and > insights. We rely on your feedback as we want our certificates and exams to > support you and the community. So, go ahead and let us know what you think > :) > > Thanks for your time and support of LPI, > > Fabian > > PS: Feel free to share this mail with anyone who might be interested in the > survey. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/20160407/0389378a/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 03:30:32 +0200 > From: Kenneth Peiruza <kenn...@floss.cat> > Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] LPI Exam and Certification Development > Survey 2016 > To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <lpi-examdev@lpi.org>, > "General discussion relating to LPI." <lpi-disc...@lpi.org> > Cc: Kevin Glendenning <kglendenn...@lpi.org> > Message-ID: <mm8ghsrf1fbu0e688018x4q4.1460079032...@email.android.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > Thanks for the survey. I could finally blame how SQL was added to lpic1, > ?modrewrite removed from lpic2 and missing specific materials and topics in > detail in lpic3XY. > Samba4+openldap is a nonsense and we definetly need practical tests as any > other linux certification does. > Thanks! > > > Enviat des del meu dispositiu Samsung > > -------- Missatge original -------- > De: Fabian Thorns <ftho...@lpi.org> > Data: 07/04/2016 20:01 (GMT+01:00) > A: "General discussion relating to LPI." <lpi-disc...@lpi.org>, "This is > the lpi-examdev mailing list." <lpi-examdev@lpi.org> > Ac: Kevin Glendenning <kglendenn...@lpi.org> > Assumpte: [lpi-examdev] LPI Exam and Certification Development Survey 2016 > > Dear LPI Community, > > In the townhall meetings held recently, the question of LPI's role in an > evolving technical world was raised.? During the last months we had > numerous discussions with people at Open Source events asking them for what > they do in their jobs, how they expect to change them in the future and > how, in their opinion, LPI should deal with such developments. ? > > First of all, I would like to thank those of you who already shared their > thoughts with us. Especially those of you who provided valuable feedback on > expectations LPI could meet better than we do today.? Based on the feedback > we?ve received so far, we would like to further clarify the expectations > people have of LPI.? Therefore, we created an online survey that covers the > aspects mentioned most often in consultations.? The survey is anonymous and > should take about 15 to 20 minutes.? It is open for participation until > April 30th, 2016. > > You can find the survey at > > ? https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/3CN7WG9 > > With your participation, you will provide LPI with valuable feedback and > insights. We rely on your feedback as we want our certificates and exams to > support you and the community. So, go ahead and let us know what you think > :) > > Thanks for your time and support of LPI, > > Fabian > > PS: Feel free to share this mail with anyone who might be interested in > the survey. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/20160408/c375c11a/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > lpi-examdev@lpi.org > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > > End of lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 96, Issue 1 > ****************************************** > -- Jeremy Hajek Systems Architect - School of Applied Technology Industry Associate Professor of Information Technology and Management ext: 630-682-6075 (2-6075) lab: 630-682-6060 (2-6060) Main: 312-567-5291 (7-5291) cell: 630-666-1961 skype: jeremy.hajek
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
