+1 for these changes...samba 3 should definitely go.

I know there are a lot of samba3 installs still out there....but there
shouldn't be. :)

On Sep 17, 2016 2:17 PM, "Fabian Thorns" <ftho...@lpi.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> taking a look at
>
>   https://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-3_300_Objectives_V1
>
> You will notice that it's time to review the current LPIC-300 objectives
> to ensure they are still up to date. Therefore I'd like you all to share
> your thoughts about our current objectives with the list, including wishes
> what should be changed in the next update. We have however to obey that it
> will be "minor update", so we can't fundamentally turn the while exam
> around.
>
> Some things we should discuss from my point of view would be:
>
>  * Relevance of NT4 domains vs. AD domains
>  * Same for NBNS vs. DNS
>  * Shift from Samba 3 to Samba 4 (which shouldn't cause too much trouble,
> though)
>
> However, I don't want to limit the discussion on these points. Just go
> ahead and point out what you think. As usual, I will comment when necessary
> and condense all the comments into a draft for potential updated objectives
> which we will then review altogether again.
>
> Looking forward to an interesting discussion,
>
> Fabian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to