Thanks for all the great information about LPIC tutorials and documents

>From @Anselm Lingnau  - exercises have a place I would think but not as
discrete as typing "ls"  but more so asking people for a command to
navigate up and down a directory hierarchy would be a better example.

There seems to be two streams here of tutorials and material - the "write a
book in a weekend"  - one book I completed 12 chapters on is here:
https://github.com/jhajek/linux-text-book-part-1

The other is the is the list of current documentation - what about asking
for a small group of volunteers to make a sub-committee and produce some
proposals/review current offerings for the entire mailing list to weigh in
on?  What is everyone's thoughts?

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, <lpi-examdev-requ...@lpi.org> wrote:

> Send lpi-examdev mailing list submissions to
>         lpi-examdev@lpi.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         lpi-examdev-requ...@lpi.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         lpi-examdev-ow...@lpi.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lpi-examdev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re:  lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2 (Costas Senekkis)
>    2. Re:  lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2 (Anselm Lingnau)
>    3. Re:  dealing with the dearth of LPIC training materials
>       (Ingo Wichmann)
>    4. Re:  lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2
>       (Martin M?ller Skarbiniks Pedersen)
>    5. Re:  dealing with the dearth of LPIC training materials
>       (P?ter J?nos Kerekes)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:39:48 +0200
> From: Costas Senekkis <cos...@computrainlearning.com>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2
> To: lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> Message-ID: <1e01614b1d6b1fecdfb3b30082711...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> LPIC 1 materials need to be written again from scratch (my opinion) and
> from my experience what students like more are the exercises meaning to
> have practical exercises to practice in order to learn how to do things.
>
> Regards,
>
> Costas Senekkis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lpi-examdev-boun...@lpi.org [mailto:lpi-examdev-boun...@lpi.org] On
> Behalf Of lpi-examdev-requ...@lpi.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 11:23 AM
> To: lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> Subject: lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2
>
> Send lpi-examdev mailing list submissions to
>         lpi-examdev@lpi.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         lpi-examdev-requ...@lpi.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         lpi-examdev-ow...@lpi.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of lpi-examdev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re:  dealing with the dearth of LPIC training materials
>       (Anselm Lingnau)
>    2. Re:  dealing with the dearth of LPIC training materials
>       (Marco Verleun)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:15:36 +0100
> From: Anselm Lingnau <ans...@tuxcademy.org>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] dealing with the dearth of LPIC training
>         materials
> To: lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> Message-ID: <2035900.cFfS5zCJlt@ceilidh>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Kenneth Peiruza wrote:
>
> > LPIC 1 order isn't the most intuitive.
>
> I don't think anyone ever claimed that the order of the objectives in the
> list is the order in which they should be taught or presented in a book.
> You could do it in a book that presupposes its readers are quite
> conversant with Linux and just need some cracks filled in for the exam,
> but for people who are fairly new to Linux, the approach, as we say in the
> business, sucks.
>
> At the risk of tooting my own horn, while we're talking LPIC training
> materials, in the tuxcademy project we have a bunch of free manuals for
> LPIC-1 at https://www.tuxcademy.org/ and they're generally getting rave
> reviews. I agree that more work is needed for LPIC-2 (let alone LPIC-3),
> but as far as
> LPIC-1 is concerned we're good.
>
> If anyone wants to work with us on writing or translating free Linux/FLOSS
> training materials then contact me.
>
> Anselm
> --
> Anselm Lingnau ? ans...@tuxcademy.org ? https://www.tuxcademy.org Freie
> Schulungsmaterialien f?r Linux und Open-Source-Software Free Training
> Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:30:47 +0100
> From: Marco Verleun <ma...@marcoach.nl>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] dealing with the dearth of LPIC training
>         materials
> To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <lpi-examdev@lpi.org>
> Message-ID: <75483dd1-9442-482b-903a-b55965bee...@marcoach.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Has anyone seen this before?
>
> http://lpic2.unix.nl <http://lpic2.unix.nl/>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>
> Marco Verleun
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ma...@marcoach.nl
> www.marcoach.nl
> 06-44 55 22 70
>
> ? Certified Master Trainer
> LPI Certified
> Lid Apple Consultants Network
>
> BTW: NL-191980882B02
> KvK: 54438519
> DUNS: 49-041-7366
> Registered with CRKBO: https://www.crkbo.nl/Register/Docenten
>
>
>
>
> > Op 9 mrt. 2017, om 10:15 heeft Anselm Lingnau <ans...@tuxcademy.org> het
> volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Kenneth Peiruza wrote:
> >
> >> LPIC 1 order isn't the most intuitive.
> >
> > I don't think anyone ever claimed that the order of the objectives in
> the list
> > is the order in which they should be taught or presented in a book. You
> could
> > do it in a book that presupposes its readers are quite conversant with
> Linux
> > and just need some cracks filled in for the exam, but for people who are
> > fairly new to Linux, the approach, as we say in the business, sucks.
> >
> > At the risk of tooting my own horn, while we're talking LPIC training
> > materials, in the tuxcademy project we have a bunch of free manuals for
> LPIC-1
> > at https://www.tuxcademy.org/ and they're generally getting rave
> reviews. I
> > agree that more work is needed for LPIC-2 (let alone LPIC-3), but as far
> as
> > LPIC-1 is concerned we're good.
> >
> > If anyone wants to work with us on writing or translating free
> Linux/FLOSS
> > training materials then contact me.
> >
> > Anselm
> > --
> > Anselm Lingnau ? ans...@tuxcademy.org ? https://www.tuxcademy.org
> > Freie Schulungsmaterialien f?r Linux und Open-Source-Software
> > Free Training Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software
> > _______________________________________________
> > lpi-examdev mailing list
> > lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/201703
> 09/de40bb39/attachment.htm
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: PastedGraphic-7.tiff
> Type: image/tiff
> Size: 13228 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/201703
> 09/de40bb39/attachment.tiff
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 801 bytes
> Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
> Url :
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/201703
> 09/de40bb39/attachment.pgp
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>
> End of lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2
> *******************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:05:37 +0100
> From: Anselm Lingnau <ans...@tuxcademy.org>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2
> To: lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> Message-ID: <2006192.XaHHP2tnMV@ceilidh>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Costas Senekkis wrote:
>
> > LPIC 1 materials need to be written again from scratch (my opinion)
>
> Great. Go right ahead ;^)
>
> > and
> > from my experience what students like more are the exercises meaning to
> > have practical exercises to practice in order to learn how to do things.
>
> What would those exercises look like in your opinion? Our manuals contain
> exercises but they are usually geared towards getting readers to apply the
> material in a different context, and less towards rote repetition of what
> is
> in the text.
>
> Back when I was a certified Novell instructor, we used to teach classes for
> SUSE Linux Enterprise Server based on Novell's materials, which contained
> ?exercises? along the lines of:
>
>   EXERCISE. Practice listing directory content.
>
>   1. Navigate to the /tmp directory by issuing the command
>
>      cd /tmp
>
>      followed by the RETURN key.
>
>   2. Display the content of the /tmp directory by issuing the command
>
>      ls
>
>      followed by the RETURN key.
>
> As far as I'm concerned such ?exercises? are a waste of space. Anyone who
> reads about the ?ls? command in the training manual and doesn't try it for
> themselves without being prodded to do it by the manual in the shape of an
> ?exercise? has a problem right there.
>
> I'm all in favour of larger-scale ?practical lab? exercises that require
> people to apply their knowledge in a wider context. I'm not convinced that
> setting exercises and letting people learn stuff on their own based on what
> the exercise requires is a panacea ? it may work in a self-learning setup
> where students have essentially unlimited time, but I used to teach
> commercial
> instructor-led classroom courses where there was never enough time to begin
> with, and therefore letting students work out stuff on their own would have
> (a) severely limited the scope of the course, and (b) probably led to
> riots on
> the part of participants who presumably paid loads of money to have an
> instructor teach them stuff, rather than have an instructor sit in the room
> while they were teaching themselves stuff which they could just as well
> have
> done at home for free.
>
> Every so often we would be able to teach a longer class where (on top of
> the
> usual smaller-scale exercises interspersed with class work) on the last
> day we
> would have the opportunity to ask students to, e.g, ?please build a system
> that has a web server in the DMZ for a number of internal users who can use
> FTP to put stuff into their accounts (but not into other users' accounts),
> with a suitable firewall, log monitoring, etc.? in order to bring together
> everything we taught during the course in one big example, but
> unfortunately
> these were the exception rather than the rule. There are people who think
> that
> you should *start* your course with that exercise and have the rest of the
> course consist of the participants figuring out the various bits and pieces
> needed to put this together, but we never got that to work really well. The
> theory says that it's easier if you have, say, nine people in the class and
> you can divide them up in groups of three, with one web server guy, one FTP
> server guy, and one firewall guy per group, where all the web server guys
> get
> together etc. and then go back to their group to explain the web server to
> the
> other two, but our classes, especially the more advanced classes, seldom if
> ever were that big.
>
> Anselm
> --
> Anselm Lingnau ? ans...@tuxcademy.org ? https://www.tuxcademy.org
> Freie Schulungsmaterialien f?r Linux und Open-Source-Software
> Free Training Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:14:04 +0100
> From: Ingo Wichmann <iw-lis...@villa-vogelsang.de>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] dealing with the dearth of LPIC training
>         materials
> To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <lpi-examdev@lpi.org>
> Message-ID: <92229c41-c52e-4463-2594-92c09f5cf...@villa-vogelsang.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hi there,
>
> starting last year we use tuxcademy training materials in our entry
> level Linux training. And I like working with it. Readable, profound
> texts. And interesting exercises.
>
> Ingo
>
>
>
> Am 09.03.2017 um 10:15 schrieb Anselm Lingnau:
> > At the risk of tooting my own horn, while we're talking LPIC training
> > materials, in the tuxcademy project we have a bunch of free manuals for
> LPIC-1
> > at https://www.tuxcademy.org/ and they're generally getting rave
> reviews. I
> > agree that more work is needed for LPIC-2 (let alone LPIC-3), but as far
> as
> > LPIC-1 is concerned we're good.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:15:19 +0100
> From: Martin M?ller Skarbiniks Pedersen <traxpla...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2
> To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <lpi-examdev@lpi.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <CAGAA5bcHx-XPM9WLq4UOorFhu81ca947kUSBxR9h
> rzal5b7...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 9 March 2017 at 10:39, Costas Senekkis <cos...@computrainlearning.com>
> wrote:
>
> > LPIC 1 materials need to be written again from scratch (my opinion) and
> > from my experience what students like more are the exercises meaning to
> > have practical exercises to practice in order to learn how to do things.
>
>
> Well, I think there are great LPIC-1 and LPIC-2 books out there.
>
> I am teaching LPIC 1 and 2 for 40-50 people a year.
>
> For LPIC-2 I am using a book by William "Bo" Rothwell.
> http://www.pearsonitcertification.com/store/lpic-2-cert-guide-201-
> 400-and-202-400-exams-9780789757142
>
> For the LPIC-1 I am using two books:
> "LPIC-1 Linux Professional Institute Certification Study Guide" from Sybex
> and
> "CompTIA Linux+/LPIC-1 Certification All-in-One Exam Guide, Second Edition
> (Exams LX0-103 & LX0-104/101-400 & 102-400)"
>
> They also contains quiz and exercises.
>
>
> Regards
> Martin M. S. Pedersen
> SuperUsers A/S, Denmark
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/
> attachments/20170309/824ab3c4/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:22:52 +0100
> From: P?ter J?nos Kerekes <m...@kerekespeterjanos.hu>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] dealing with the dearth of LPIC training
>         materials
> To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <lpi-examdev@lpi.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <CAEaUzst=FWhejDtd36Ca3rpZuSDWDv=7rkAgoU
> x6yeccnzx...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> The lpic2.Unix.nl  page ist professional!
>
> Thank you very Much!
>
>
> // from mobile
>
> Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen / Best regards:  P?ter J?nosKerekes
> Linux System Administrator | Sitebuilder | OpenSource | Contemporary Fine &
> Conceptual Art
> mobil: +49 151 52592393 | email:m...@kerekespeterjanos.hu
> website  |  linkedin profile  |  xing profile
>
> Am 09.03.2017 10:31 schrieb "Marco Verleun" <ma...@marcoach.nl>:
>
> Has anyone seen this before?
>
> http://lpic2.unix.nl
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>
> Marco Verleun
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ma...@marcoach.nl
> www.marcoach.nl
> 06-44 55 22 70
>
> ? Certified Master Trainer
> LPI Certified
> Lid Apple Consultants Network
>
> BTW: NL-191980882B02
> KvK: 54438519
> DUNS: 49-041-7366
> Registered with CRKBO: https://www.crkbo.nl/Register/Docenten
>
>
>
>
> Op 9 mrt. 2017, om 10:15 heeft Anselm Lingnau <ans...@tuxcademy.org> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Kenneth Peiruza wrote:
>
> LPIC 1 order isn't the most intuitive.
>
>
> I don't think anyone ever claimed that the order of the objectives in the
> list
> is the order in which they should be taught or presented in a book. You
> could
> do it in a book that presupposes its readers are quite conversant with
> Linux
> and just need some cracks filled in for the exam, but for people who are
> fairly new to Linux, the approach, as we say in the business, sucks.
>
> At the risk of tooting my own horn, while we're talking LPIC training
> materials, in the tuxcademy project we have a bunch of free manuals for
> LPIC-1
> at https://www.tuxcademy.org/ and they're generally getting rave reviews.
> I
> agree that more work is needed for LPIC-2 (let alone LPIC-3), but as far as
> LPIC-1 is concerned we're good.
>
> If anyone wants to work with us on writing or translating free Linux/FLOSS
> training materials then contact me.
>
> Anselm
> --
> Anselm Lingnau ? ans...@tuxcademy.org ? https://www.tuxcademy.org
> Freie Schulungsmaterialien f?r Linux und Open-Source-Software
> Free Training Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/
> attachments/20170309/e88bcc26/attachment.htm
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: PastedGraphic-7.tiff
> Type: image/tiff
> Size: 13228 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url : http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/
> attachments/20170309/e88bcc26/attachment.tiff
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> lpi-examdev@lpi.org
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>
> End of lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 3
> *******************************************
>



-- 
Jeremy Hajek
Systems Architect - School of Applied Technology
Industry Associate Professor of Information Technology and Management
ext: 630-682-6075 (2-6075)
lab: 630-682-6060 (2-6060)
Main: 312-567-5291 (7-5291)
cell: 630-666-1961
skype: jeremy.hajek
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to