On 29/11/2017 21:37, Michael Hart wrote:
> I don't know if this is the right spot, I am making a through study
> guide in tiddlywiki, a USB question says that USB filesystem can be
> found under/proc/bus/usb but I have only found it under /proc/sub/usb
> which is correct for the test?


There is no /proc/sub, there is however a /proc/bus

The wrong one is a transposition or spoonerism, also know as "a typo"


> 
> On Nov 29, 2017 10:25 AM, <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Send lpi-examdev mailing list submissions to
>             [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>     To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>             http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>     <http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev>
>     or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>             [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>     You can reach the person managing the list at
>             [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>     When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>     than "Re: Contents of lpi-examdev digest..."
> 
> 
>     Today's Topics:
> 
>        1. Re:  LPIC-1 Exam 102 Objectives Discussion - clean up 110.1
>           and 110.2 (Alan McKinnon)
> 
> 
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     Message: 1
>     Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:24:02 +0200
>     From: Alan McKinnon <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] LPIC-1 Exam 102 Objectives Discussion -
>             clean up 110.1 and 110.2
>     To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
>     On 29/11/2017 00:15, Ingo Wichmann wrote:
>     > Hi there,
>     >
>     > I think 110.1 and 110.2 need a clean up.
>     >
>     > What's the difference between "Perform security administration tasks"
>     > and "Setup host security"?
> 
>     I think the average sysadmin out there would have these concepts in
>     mind:
> 
>     perform security administration tasks: sweep user accounts for inactive
>     ones and remove them. Stop and deinstall defunk and unneeded services.
>     Examine fail2ban et all logs to see if rules need more tweaking etc etc
> 
>     setup host security:
>     create firewall rules table; set allowed_hosts in various daemon
>     configs, etc etc
> 
>     The distinction is the second category can be done by automation because
>     it's the usual, the first category needs eyeballs because you are
>     looking for the unusual
> 
>     >
>     > Why is "Set or change user passwords and password aging
>     information." in
>     > 110.1 and "Awareness of shadow passwords and how they work." in 110.2?
> 
>     Why two categories? We no longer have passwords in /etc/passwd anywhere,
>     we do not have "shadow passwords" either, we only have local Unix
>     passwords and they always go in one place, protected by permissions
> 
>     >
>     > I'd prefer, if we would move all network related stuff to 110.2 and
>     > rename 110.2 to "basic network security". And 110.1 to "host
>     security".
>     >
>     > netstat-> ss:
>     > We should replace netstat with ss, because netstat comes from the
>     legacy
>     > net-tools.
> 
>     Agreed. Old farts like me who prefer netstat are very welcome to learn
>     it on their own time
> 
>     >
>     > ulimit:
>     > Does anybody still use ulimit and /etc/security/limits.conf? Wouldn't
>     > you use loginctl and/or systemd-run for that?
> 
>     I'd actually forgotten there even is a thing called ulimits
> 
>     >
>     > Wifi:
>     > I think canditates should be able to check whether they use an
>     encrypted
>     > connection using network-manager
> 
>     I would extend this to some knowledge of what kinf of connection, as in
>     "WEP=bad" "WPA="ok-ish"
> 
>     >
>     > iptables:
>     > if we get rid of TCP wrappers we could include simple iptables usage:
>     > close single ports using iptables. In my opinion, thats much more
>     common
>     > today.
> 
>     Agreed. All I would expect an LPI-1 grad to know about iptables is how
>     to set connection tracking and then allow deny a port or range of ports
>     to/from a host or range of hosts.
>     >
>     > Ingo
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > lpi-examdev mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>     <http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev>
>     >
> 
> 
>     --
>     Alan McKinnon
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
>     ------------------------------
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     lpi-examdev mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>     <http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev>
> 
>     End of lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 111, Issue 24
>     ********************************************
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
> 


-- 
Alan McKinnon
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to