Hi 

I respect the bsd community greatly. 
But I do see the clash with the "Linux professional institute" name. 
Other than that, great addition. The more the merrier. 

Just my €0,02.

Greets, 
Jeroen Baten 

⁣Verzonden door TypeApp ​

Op 27 mei 2018 22:22, om 22:22, Fabian Thorns <[email protected]> schreef:
>HI everyone,
>
>some of you might have heard that the BSD Certification Group recently
>joined BSD. Over the last couples of months we've been working on
>adjusting
>the existing BSD Associate objectives in the LPI format. Today, we are
>proud to share the current draft objectives for the upcoming LPI BSD
>Associate certification:
>
>  https://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPI-BSD_Associate_Objectives_V1.0
>
>The certification will not be part of the LPIC track, it will be a
>single
>exam that leads to the LPI BSDA certification. Similar to the DevOps
>Tools
>Engineer, it will be classified as an 'Open Technology' certification.
>
>As usual, please share any thoughts and comments either here, or
>directly
>with me or our BSD Advisory Board lead, Dru. Also, if you have a
>background
>in BSD and have not yet been involved in the exam development, feel
>free to
>speak up :)
>
>Fabian
>
>-- 
>Fabian Thorns <[email protected]> GPG: F1426B12
>Director of Certification Development, Linux Professional Institute
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>lpi-examdev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to