Hi,

i total agree with Kenneth, FreeIPA and 389 Server must be part of the 300 Exam. Also i think it is a good thing to gave a new Name for this Part.

So, just another though i have:  there a new Exams in Mind, what about the Name ( Number) of the Exam.For me it makes no sense to call it LPI-300 / 303 and 304. There a LPI-1 and LPI-2. Maybe the new Name could be LPI-3.0, LPI-3.3 or LPI 3.4 or something else. Or something different?!

Regards from Castrop-Rauxel,

Dirk



Am 19.11.18 um 09:15 schrieb Kenneth Peiruza:
Lpic 300, for sure. Get rid of openldap, show "LDAP"&ldap-utils + FreeIPA+Samba4.

That makes sense to me. So far, openldap has no direct relationship with Samba4, it made sense for samba3, but not anymore, and as we lost the auth integration with openldap when 301 got removed, it's there in 300 doing little or nothing.

IMHO a chapter or two on pentesting would make 303 way more attractive (students always ask me to extend a bit on attack tools: enumeration, scanning & bruteforce logins).

Regards,

Kenneth


On Nov 18, 2018 1:54 PM, Fabian Thorns <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi there,

    sorry for starting another thread. After spending some time
    thinking about your mails regarding 300 and 303, I'd like to ask
    for your opinion on one specific question that seems crucial to
    me: Where do we want to cover FreeIPA and SSSD? Do we see them
    mainly as tools to harden systems or as tools to integrate
    authentication realms (either 'mixed' or 'non-mixed')?

    If we decide for the latter, we might consider moving FreeIPA from
    303 to 300, extend it there and maybe replace OpenLDAP with 389
    Server (and potentially do the same for LPIC-2 in the next
    revision). This seems a reasonable use of the weights freed up by
    NT4 domains; and we might fill the gap it leaves in 303 with some
    basic pentesting (this should be discussed elsewhere, though).

    What do you think?

    Fabian

-- Fabian Thorns <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> GPG: F1426B12
    Director of Certification Development, Linux Professional Institute



_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to