A few suggestions to keep-in-mind  ...
 - LPI also offers a DevOps cert
 - Don't be afraid to suggest both 200 and 300 level, and concentrate on
what should be at each level

That said, I agree (more of my personal views) ...
 - Cloud-init is probably required 200-level
 - It needs to be Linux/open source focused only
 - If interfaces/API are generic or emulated in open source, they are open
for discussion

As always ... just my personal views, as a peer, and I don't speak for
anyone or any entity.

- bjs


On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:31 AM Kenneth Peiruza <[email protected]> wrote:

> IMHO Amazon is the king of clouds right now, but showing bits of it
> instead of other reference cloud providers would be ugly, like taking
> sides, and in a so rapidly changing field as IT is ... Who knows who will
> be the top cloud provider in 5 years,?will AWS look at least close to what
> it looks right now by then? It will require quite a lot of maintenance
> updates and it isn't Linux/Opensource-centric at all, whilst all the rest
> of certifications are.
>
> Azure is getting bigger everyday and looks like Google has taken the cloud
> issue personally.
>
> So, in my opinion, maybe something neutral as cloud-init makes sense, but
> I wouldn't see right to include closed&proprietary interfaces on any LPIc,
> or at worst in a future "lpic-about cloud", and even lesser of it somehow
> gave an extra advantage to specific companies.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kenneth
>
> On Nov 27, 2018 4:02 PM, Bear Giles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The tests shouldn't overlap the AWS certs but it's such a gorilla that
> many people have to be aware of some fundamentals. E.g., there's a good
> chance that the systems you're configuring and maintaining are on EC2
> instances. You can treat this as simple PAAS provisioning but since the 201
> covers capacity planning I think that knowing that AWS and other cloud
> providers can be used for elasticity - to "scale out" instead of "scale up"
> - is worth at least a point. That could mean a greater emphasis on
> integrating other services than the less common configuration options.
>
> For instance let's take a postfix server. The cloud monitor could launch a
> new instance when the existing servers reach 80% capacity for more than an
> hour. You can take your time ahead of time testing the server configuration
> with manual in hand so you don't have to memorize the details of obscure
> features. You just need to know that they're there. My big needs are how do
> you automate integration into the system?  E.g., how do you configure the
> server to use LDAP for user details? Can you require strong mutual
> authentication using digital certs? Kerberos? How do you specify where the
> mail is written and will there be problems if multiple email servers are
> writing to it?
>
> For what it's worth we've had the production team maintain our dev/qa
> servers but we have so many different combinations that we're paying a
> fortune for servers that are rarely used. As a devop I've been tasked with
> finding a solution that meets the needs of the dev and qa teams and not
> just take on the responsibilities previously done by the production team.
> My proposal is a webapp (HTML, REST) where a person or test script can ask
> for a 4 hour lease on, oh, a MySQL database with certain properties. It
> will be entirely automated - a lot like automatic provisioning by a cloud
> provider. (In fact we may end up using that on our back end.) I need to
> know how to set up different configurations but more importantly I need to
> know how to integrate these systems into our existing infrastructure. The
> current approach has been very ad hoc but that only worked since the
> systems stayed up. With ephemeral instances we need standardization.
> Knowing details, e.g., that ChallengeResponse + PAM means that a server may
> accept passwords even though PasswordAuthentication is off is also
> important but it's secondary (at the moment) to being able to automate
> everything.
>
> I know this is very different from the classic ops needs that the current
> exams test. I just wanted to toss out a similar set of job requirements,
> one with a lot of overlap but some key differences.
>
> Bear
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:20 PM Bryan Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ceph RADOSGW provides a S3 compatible API ... and is Open Source.
> AWS is not.
>
> If anything is added to the 200 level
>
> - bjs
>
> P.S.  This is why I'm in favor of splitting HA (and LB) concepts from
> Storage, at the 300 level.
>
> P.P.S.  Sorry I haven't been around.  Been slammed by work and other
> things well into the evening and weekends, continually.  That and 30 years
> as an UCF grad and alumni on Saturday.  ;)
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:12 PM Simone Piccardi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Il 19/11/18 17:10, Bear Giles ha scritto:
> > How could I forget using S3 as a web server for static content? (With
> > client-side javascript libraries and lambdas that means you can often
> > create "serverless" websites.) Candidates shouldn't need to know the
> > details but should know that S3 is an alternative to apache and nginx,
> > and they should know that you can configure S3 so it sends an alert when
> > a file is deleted and that means you can use cheaper 'spot instances'
> > for scalability using cheaper spot instances. For instance you may have
> > full-resolution video on permanent S3 and video in different formats on
> > spot storage. When the latter file is deleted it automatically triggers
> > a process that will recreate it. This is usually finished by the time a
> > user requests a copy of the file, esp. if you are also using a caching
> > layer.
> >
> > Candidates shouldn't need to know the details of how to do this but they
> > should understand that a request for a "web server" might be satisfied
> > by S3 and a lighter EC2 instance instead of a more expensive EBS and a
> > heftier EC2 instance running the web server that provides the same
> > static content. Or that if devs use S3 storage they may also may also
> > need SNS (iirc) so they can receive notifications. SNS means knowing
> > that the could be linked to other messaging tools, e.g., SQS that acts
> > as a JMS server.
> >
> > It sounds like I'm arguing for a cloud-specific LPIC-2 but people still
> > need to be able to set up most (not all) conventional servers as well.
> > That's especially true with privacy laws that have a consequence of
> > encouraging hybrid solutions where sensitive information is stored in a
> > small data center the company controls while the public access is
> > entirely done in a scalable public cloud. No unencrypted sensitive
> > information would ever be on the public cloud, not even only in memory.
> > Someone in that situation needs to know the costs and benefits of both
> > S3 and apache/nginx, of RDS and their own oracle/mssql/mysql/postgresql
> > server, etc.
>
> I was thinking that 202 is a Linux senior sysadmin exam, it seems to me
> that you are talking about an Amazon services admin exams.
>
> Don't see anything on this regarding Linux knowledge. But probably I'm
> missing something.
>
>
> Regards
> Simone
> --
> Simone Piccardi                                 Truelite Srl
> [email protected] (email/jabber)             Via Monferrato, 6
> Tel. +39-347-1032433                            50142 Firenze
> http://www.truelite.it                          Tel. +39-055-7879597
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Bryan J Smith  -  http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
> E-mail:  b.j.smith at ieee.org  or  me at bjsmith.me
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev



-- 

-- 
Bryan J Smith  -  http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
E-mail:  b.j.smith at ieee.org  or  me at bjsmith.me
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to