Sergio Belkin <[email protected]> wrote: > Also it could be interesting be aware of conflicts between kvm and virtualbox.
I think you're addressing your own comment there. I.e., 'conflicts between' the Linux Kernel[.org] Virtual Machine (KVM) and VirtualBox. AFAIC, there are no conflicts I'm aware of between KVM and the pure, GPLv2 VirtualBox ... however, using a 'NON-FREE' implementation of VirtualBox usually causes conflicts.** E.g., Fedora ships a virtualbox-* package set that is pure GPLv2 (even if not completely Upstream kernel.org), but that may have conflicts with the separate repositories that are not considered 100% GPLv2. - bjs **P.S. Has the core of VirtualBox been accepted Upstream and is now in kernel.org? Both the HyperVisor and guest tools? I haven't tracked VirtualBox, but this has typically been an issue in the past. -- Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith E-mail: b.j.smith at ieee.org or me at bjsmith.me _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
