> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 1 09:42:15 2000
> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 11:28:34 -0400
> From: "William R. Knox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LPRng: Problem with checkpc
>
> Unless their configuration files (i.e. .paprc files) were special files
> or zero length, they shouldn't have gotten removed by checkpc (at least
> not as it stands in version 3.6.22). However, only looking for what you
> know you created in there probably does make sense. Ah, well - so much
> for my hope to get a patch credit in the CHANGES file. I'll just have to
> keep looking for easy little tidbits :-)
>
> --
> Bill Knox
> Senior Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst
> The MITRE Corporation
Ummm... well you get an honorable mention:
I have once again changed the checkpc code to be very very very
conservative in what it removes from the spool queues. This will make the
folks who use netatalk, etc. very happy. The bad news is that files
put into these directories by other tools will not get removed. C'est
la vie, C'est la guerre...
(Patches inpiring the changes sent by: "William R. Knox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient,
to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with: | example:
subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
