> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 14:09:07 2000
> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:55:12 +0000 (GMT)
> From: iddwb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: LPRng: jet direct recommendations
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> I'm finding that connecting to jetdirect with lpq is very time consuming,
> and fails frequently. So I am thinking that it is advantageous to have
> separate :server: and :localhost: definitions in printcap. Thus, when lpq
> -Pmylocal is queried, the client doesn't have to wait or be
> rejected. Does anyone have any optimal way of dealing with jet direct
> printers in printcap?
>
> David Bear
> College of Public Programs/ASU
Look at the :remote_support option.
:remote_support=R
is probably what you want in the printcap.
Patrick
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
The address you post from MUST be your subscription address
If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient,
to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with: | example:
subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
