On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:31:42 -0800 (PST), David Fetrow wrote:
> lprng, alone, is very nearly a dropin replacement, it's a superset.
Thanks for the reply.
My biggest concern was that LPRng offered a bunch of security features
and I didn't want to suddenly find that all of my users couldn't print
because I'd not set that up.
> If you also want to use ifhp it gets a bit more complicated. If you
> are already using magicfilter or some such you can continue doing
> that without ifhp. I haven't tried to combine them.
That was my other concern. The lpr that came with Red Hat 6.1 offered a
management and filter system, packages printtool and rhs-printfilters.
What happens to these when one upgrades to LPRng?
Ken
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sewingwitch.com/ken/
[If answering a mailing list posting, please don't cc me your reply. I'll take my
answer on the list.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
The address you post from MUST be your subscription address
If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient,
to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with: | example:
subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
