> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 12 12:50:40 2002 > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:58:09 -0800 > From: Sam Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: LPRng: AUTHTYPE=kerberos5 > > Neat trick. It seems that AUTHTYPE=kerberos5 does not work but > AUTHTYPE=kerberos *does*. > > This brings me to my next question, is there a reason that by > default, lpr will try to lookup a principle for lpr/host (or > lpr.host) rather than lpr/host.domain? I've been using precompiled RPMs, > but if the solution is just something along the lines of "recompile > without kerberos4 support" then that seems pretty reasonable. Of course, > adding kerberos_id lines to my printcap seems reasonable enough as > well.
Hmmm... I don't know why I did it this way. At one time I had a long talk with some folks at MIT about what to do and they suggested doing it this way. I was under the impression that if you did not supply a domain then the KRB5 library would append the 'appropriate' domain based on the current domain, but I am probably wrong about this. I think that using kerberos_id is the best solution. Patrick ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST The address you post from MUST be your subscription address If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient, to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with: | example: subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
