So, for example, I wouldn't use it to transfer a job to another
spooler (which isn't necessary because the lpr channel is 8-bit clean,
correct?)... and uh... hmm, I'm stumped. Could you please give an example
of an evil thing happening in some other situation (ie, not talking to my
printer on port 9100)? No doubt something will arise if I start using it
everywhere and I'd like to get an idea of the likely consequences.
/* Sam */
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:08:12PM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote:
> > What are the implications of enabling [tbcp] all the
> > time? Will anything stop working which worked before?
> >
> > /* Sam */
>
> use it ONLY when talking DIRECTLY to a network printer.
>
> Evil things have been known to happen otherwise.
>
> Patrick ("Bring on the holy water...") Powell
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
The address you post from MUST be your subscription address
If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient,
to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with: | example:
subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
