> In a word - Haa (no offense intended) > > What you are asking for is a bug-free postscript interpreter. > I suppose one could take the attitude that postscript is > whatever Adobe says it is and therefore by definition one of > their postscript chips is it - do you buy that? > > The problem is that Postscript isn't a simple, straight forward, > context free language like Perl (humour intended) - it must be > interpreted. There's not even any assurance that it's internally > consistent. > > If you find one let us all know.
Hmmm, yes, fair enough. I suppose what I'm trying to work out is whether the postscript interpreter in certain printers is at fault or if the actual postscript that I'm printing is. I realise it's a difficult thing to tell. Toby ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST The address you post from MUST be your subscription address If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient, to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with: | example: subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
