On Tue, 4 May 2004, Ramon Andi�ach wrote: > Hello all, > I was wondering if there had been any recent reportings of the error > metioned in this post http://groups.yahoo.com/grou > p/lprng/message/2513 ? > > I seem to have an error identical or very similar to that one after a > recent upgrade from the stable(3.0, lprng 3.8.10, glibc2.2) to testing > (lprng 3.8.26, glibc2.3) (binary) distributions of Debian. The major > difference appears to be that I seem to be able to get very small > files printed (~60K from a remote computer and something less than 60Mb > from the server).
[snip] > b) and also Dietmar's suggestion > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lprng/message/2522 > which involved editing lpd_rcvjob.c > The source compiled, but wouldn't run claiming it couldn't lock the > Unix socket (and it didn't matter what that variable was defined as). Ok, this is called debian wants to do things its way. I've now got this suggestion in, but I would like to know if there's a better way. ramon. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST The address you post from MUST be your subscription address If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient, to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with: | example: subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
