Denis Silakov <[email protected]> writes: > Yes, there are a lot of misunderstanding there and it looks that Debian > guys have only superficial knowledge about how LSB is supposed to > work. In particular, no mention of the huge test suite that can be > useful even if you are not going to certify for compliance but just want > to increase quality of your distribution.
I think there's some general understanding in Debian that all this stuff exists, at least among those of us who have been following LSB for some time. The problem, rather, is that no one in Debian cares enough about it to put the work into actually using that test suite and resolving issues that it uncovers. That, in turn, is because LSB doesn't seem to be scratching any itches that we currently have. Debian almost never gets requests to work with some random third-party package that develops to the LSB (in part because Debian isn't really ideologically aligned with most of the authors of those types of packages). In the few cases where Debian would really benefit from third-party support, those vendors don't seem to care about the LSB and are focused on such things as kernel versions, hardware support, or very specific operating system versions. In other words, this is really about available resources and perceived value, and the calculus of that is different for a volunteer project that doesn't care at all about feature checklists or other drivers that might push one towards doing the work to get the conformance test suite set up. Debian also relies heavily on upstream software maintainers to handle testing and debugging individual software components rather than doing a lot of distribution-level testing. That again isn't a judgement about utility, just a statement about resources. I'm sure Debian would get a lot out of more distribution-level testing, but it's a volunteer-maintained distribution, and someone has to care enough to work on it. And that sort of work requires sustained effort over a more extended period of time to bear fruit. If anyone felt strongly about LSB in Debian, we would absolutely support that person in adopting the LSB packages and picking up the work. Disclaimer: I've been involved in the Debian project for a long time, but am not part of the LSB maintenance team and don't have any formal role in the decision process. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ lsb-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
