On 04/07/2016 09:35 AM, Mats Wichmann wrote: > On 04/07/2016 08:11 AM, Dallman, John wrote: >> I've been building the production build Parasolid solid-modelling library >> and its test harness to LSB standards for a long time, and it has worked >> well. There is also a build with a lot of debugging code compiled in that >> has not been built LSB until now, but I'm trying to fix that. The debugging >> build is used interactively much more than the production build, and has >> used GNU readline for many years. But that's where I'm stuck. >> >> > You may also be able to use our "library battery" (a package named > lsb-build-libbat), which has a prepared libreadline.a built in the LSB > context, and thus not loaded with "illegal" symbols. Unfortunately, I > can't tell you exactly where to get a 4.0 copy of that from either. I > have a 4.1 version sitting here which I could send, if we can't find > these in the package ftp site - I didn't spot in a brief look but that > means little.
Here are the libbat packages targeted at LSB 4.0: http://ftp.linuxbase.org/pub/lsb/lsbdev/unreleased/4.0-libbat/ other versions are in http://ftp.linuxbase.org/pub/lsb/lsbdev/unreleased/4.1-libbat/ and http://ftp.linuxbase.org/pub/lsb/snapshots/libbat (5.0 version) _______________________________________________ lsb-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
