On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 06:51:08AM +0100, Martin Keegan wrote: > I think we can agree that the days of /mnt being use as a temporary mount > point, rather than as a directory containing mountpoints are over.
I don't think that... Mike Stone
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Jochem Huhmann
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Esa Turtiainen
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Martin Keegan
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Anthony Towns
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Jochem Huhmann
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Anthony Towns
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Daniel Bradley
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? keld
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Daniel Bradley
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Jochem Huhmann
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Michael Stone
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Daniel Quinlan
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? djb
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Davide Bolcioni
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? imrana
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: /mnt/cdrom or /mnt ? Walter Harms
