On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Nicholas Petreley wrote: > Erik will have to speak for himself as to his motivations, but what he > described reflects FHS, which is the standard LSB was shooting for. I don't > know how well Red Hat adheres to FHS off hand, but surely we're not going to > deliberately steer away from standards that Red Hat endorses or uses just > for the sake of not being Red Hat?
IM(NSH)O I find that Solaris 2 is propably leader when it comes to being FHS compliant. Hugo. PS: Please reduce the number of email addresses in the To:/Cc: headers. -- Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/ -------------------------------------------------------------- Use of any of my email addresses for unsollicited (commercial) email is a clear intrusion of my privacy and illegal!
