John, Our conversation was a great education on the issue and I, too, think we are in agreement. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this.
John H Terpstra wrote: > Dave, > > I think we have said enough on this issue. I believe we are not really in > disagreement at all. The LSB Spec is needed to get commercial applications > on Linux. We need to address ISV needs. We need a standard that defines > Linux, the LSB Spec v1.0 gets this under way, but this like open source > development in general is an iterative process. We will get there. > > Above all, let's work harder together to make Linux so attractive to end > users that the choice of desktop lpatform is a no brainer decision. Think > of it, we have a way to go. Let's keep working. Thanks for you input. > > - John T. > > --- > | John H Terpstra, VP Technology > | Cell: +1 801 368 4066, Office: (650) 553 9371 > | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > | Linux - the hope of the X-Files generation! > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David VomLehn<br> Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br> Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
