Matt asked a lot of questions that I was busy asking, and I hadn't seen his message, sorry for the duplication.
Here's another question: -----Original Message----- From: Matt Taggart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I personally am opposed to adding rsh, but I guess the argument could be made that the client half is probably "standard". I don't know how many distributions install rsh-server by default though. <<mats>> we can't possibly limit an LSB application from using TCP/IP to connect to a well-known port somewhere else. Making sure the right thing is listening becomes a problem that has to be dealt with outside of the spec, right?
