At 2002/7/18 15:07-0700  Wichmann, Mats D writes:
>       
> ************************************************************************
>       /tset/LSB.os/devclass/grantpt_L/T.grantpt_L 2   Failed
>       
>               Test Information:
>       grantpt(5) did not give correct results
>       ERRNO VALUES: expected: 9 (EBADF), observed: 25 (ENOTTY)
> 
>       
> ************************************************************************
>       /tset/LSB.os/devclass/grantpt_L/T.grantpt_L 3   Failed
>       
>               Test Information:
>       grantpt(5) did not give correct results
>       ERRNO VALUES: expected: 22 (EINVAL), observed: 25 (ENOTTY)

Are you running the tests using something like screen?

> ************************************************************************
>       /tset/LSB.os/genuts/ftw/T.ftw 4 Failed
>       
>               Test Information:
>       ftw(./ftw_d.1, ..., 2) returned -1 instead of 0
>       ftw did not call function with argument FTW_DNR
>       although the root of the file tree given was
>       read-only
> 
>       
> ************************************************************************
>       /tset/LSB.os/genuts/nftw/T.nftw 10      Failed
>       
>               Test Information:
>       ftw(./ftwD1/ftw_d.1, ..., 2) returned -1 instead of 0
>       ftw did not call function with argument FTW_DNR
>       although the root of the file tree given was
>       read-only

I think these 2 have been fixed in glibc CVS (Thorsten would know better).

> ************************************************************************
>       /tset/LSB.os/ioprim/readv_L/T.readv_L 24        Failed
>       
>               Test Information:
>       iov[0].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[0].iov_len = 2098176
>       iov[1].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1].iov_len = 2098176
>       iov[2].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[2].iov_len = 2098176
>       ...(lines omitted)
>       iov[1022].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1022].iov_len = 2098176
>       iov[1023].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1023].iov_len = 2098176
>       readv(5, iov, 1024) did not behave as expected
>       RETURN VALUES: expected: -1, observed: 36
>       ERRNO VALUES: expected: 22 (EINVAL), observed: 0 (NO ERROR)
> 
>       
> ************************************************************************
>       /tset/LSB.os/ioprim/writev_L/T.writev_L 30      Failed
>       
>               Test Information:
>       iov[0].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[0].iov_len = 2098176
>       iov[1].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1].iov_len = 2098176
>       iov[2].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[2].iov_len = 2098176
>       ...(lines omitted)
>       iov[1022].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1022].iov_len = 2098176
>       iov[1023].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1023].iov_len = 2098176
>       writev(7, iov, 1024) did not behave as expected:
>       RETURN VALUES: expected: -1, observed: 2147483647
>       ERRNO VALUES: expected: 22 (EINVAL), observed: 0 (NO ERROR)

These two are in the FAQ (kernel fixes).

http://www.linuxbase.org/test/lsb-runtime-test-faq.html

Incidentally I believe Alan Cox now has a different fix for these that
went into 2.5.

Regards,

Chris
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to