On Tuesday 17 September 2002 08:24, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > > This does sound cleaner. Should the last one maybe be > > <case value="default"> ??? > > Note that the problem described earlier would still > exist, unless the logic is extended either to > recognize <case> in an appropriate way, or provide a > handler routine for <case> (it doesn't care what > it does, it just cares that there's a case_main somewhere).
my C heritage says that default has always been its own keywords so why not here. However it does not matter really. case can be act like <package> or something, i.e. it contains but does not direct action.
