> recommand that such an effort make a much stronger effort to maintain > binary compatibility than the glibc folks have occasionally shown in the > past.
Nod > In the long term, having such a contaminated code as is in glibc 2.1 > would really hurt the interests of the Linux community, IMO. It may be The only problem code I can find is libio. libdb has other oddities but the license seems to be sane
