> > If `echo -n' isn't guaranteed by the LSB, we probably should get rid of them
> > from maintainer scripts. :-/
> 
> It *may* be a good idea to switch to printf in the long run, but I would
> have been much happier if SUS didn't break echo in the first place.

Its much better than this.

SUS says -n is invalid and not allowed but you must support \c etc
POSIX says -n is valid and that you must not support \c

GNU appears to be going POSIX

Reply via email to