On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Andrew Morgan wrote: > I don't believe libpwdb should be in any spec. From my perspective and > that of others that have contributed to PAM, libpwdb was a fine idea > back in the dark ages but now NSS is available (glibc), the case for > libpwdb is much deminished. I would like to see NSS better documented > though. ;)
Red Hat agrees with this, fwiw (and the pwdb author (gafton) is probably the strongest advocate of not using it). Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand | | | | Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
