Previously [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Therefore, it is not *required* for GUI applications and it is still free > on Linux.
You're missing the point here: Linux is not just about `free Linux', but about Free Software in general. And something like `free on Linux' is just Not Free. > So, why can't it be in the LSB specification? So, why should it be in the LSB specification? I don't see the use at all for adding a toolkit that is not free (as in DFSG or OSD terms) and which almost nobody uses anymore. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
