> The phrasing we ended up using was...
There we go. That is what I was looking for. :-) Where is that written in the specification, and if not then where do we insert it? >: 5) If I have an LSB compliant application that dynamically or statically >: links a non-LSB compliant library, then it is no longer LSB compliant >: because of its dependency. >I am guessing that you intend "a non-LSB compliant library" to mean "a >library which is specified by LSB but does not comply with the >specification", in which case [5] is probably correct. My intent was to say a "non-LSB compliant library" meaning any library that it is using APIs itself that are not specified by the LSB; therefore, as a standalone program it is not LSB compliant. So, if an application cannot call foo(), then a library cannot call foo() for the application with respect to LSB compliance. I appreciate your responses. This is clearing up my misunderstanding. George (gk4)
