John Mullee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This seems reasonable to me, although it's a change from what the > > SysVinit package does. Comments? > > personally I'd prefer to see /etc contain only files that change when config > changes are made. Executables (including scripts) might rather be immutable, > and be placed somewhere amenable to read-only mounting; > somewhere like /lib/lsb, /lib/lsbinit, /sbin/lsbinit, or somesuch. > Perhaps /etc might contain symlinks to 'real' scripts, for convenient > replacement..
/etc/init.d and /etc/rc.d/init.d has been used by most distributions for years now - and /etc/init.d is also used by Solaris Changing for the purpose of changing is bad... IMHO, the LSB should seek to standardize current behaviour not redesign everything. That way lies pain. > -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
