> > I dont think the LSB should be mandating many of the listed tools. Some of > > them > > are only relevant to developers for example. And why is vi required. vi is > > not > > used programatically by another tool so seems outside the lsb remit > > Akio's task was to compare the two documents and find the things that have > been missed in the LSB. He did a great job on that.
I appreciate that. I just wanted to suggest that we don't take the overlap and write the application list into the LSB. The functions are much more important and do need a lot of looking into
