Alan Cox writes: > I suspect we should leave -m in but document that it might do nothing. Thats > harmless
I dropped -m because it had two incompatible implementations. One with an argument (the address) and one without (email the user who printed the job). I checked in the new draft with a "Printing" section to CVS. Please check it out at: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ldps/ldps.html?rev=1.19&content-type=text/html&cvsroot=freestandards Does anyone see the need for an additional beta period due to the addition of the printing section? I don't see any reason to delay the official release (no comments were received) of 1.1 or any reason to leave out the printing section. - Dan
