On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > uudecode (not needed) > > > uuencode (not needed) > > > > I use uuencode/uudecode often, as microsoft products generates and > > can read this, and I have scripts that uses it. I would like > > it to stay. > > Can be versus must be. Nothing says you cant have uudecode there, just that > an LSB cant rely on it > > That is true also for bzip2. Luigi
