On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > While adding a normative statement reference in chapter one for > specifications, I noticed the section on "related implementations" > where mention is made of the following: > > * BSD BSD 4.4 Lite version 2 (no URL) > > We really should get a URL for this.... anyone know of a stable > one off-hand.
The FOLDOC dictionary at http://foldoc.efnet.org/index.html has no entry for "BSD 4.4-lite". However, they have one about "FreeBSD", mentioning is is based on BSD 4.4-lite and has its homepage at http://www.freebsd.org. Hmm... I was browsing around at the Berkeley web site and found the following: http://buffy.eecs.berkeley.edu/IRO/Software/Catalog/addl.resource.html BERKELEY UNIX For information about 4.3BSD, 4.3BSD/Tahoe, 4.4BSD encumbered, and 4.4BSD lite, contact: Computer Systems Research Group (CSRG) 380 Soda Hall # 1776 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1776 (510) 642-7780 Fax: (510) 642-5775 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, there was no URL :( Maybe we should ask one of the above mentioned persons, if there is such a thing. > Also, these functions should probably get documented first when we start > the LSB 1.1 effort, since I'm concerned about "code drift"; it's been a > long time since BSD 4.4 Lite, and the library interfaces may have > changed in subtle ways since then. Yes, that sounds reasonable. > * GNU/Linux defacto standard http://www.gnu.org/ > > This is a bit too broad; if we mean "glibc" or "bash" we should > say so, and then specify exaclty which version we mean. Yes. Bye. LenZ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Lenz Grimmer SuSE GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Schanzaeckerstr. 10 http://www.suse.de/~grimmer/ 90443 Nuernberg, Germany The only argument with the wind is to put on a coat.
