On Wed, Apr 11, Stuart Anderson wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > On the current LSB spec, the rexec() call is sorted under > > "Regular expressions". But rexec() is a (I think BSD) function > > for remote execution and used by the rexec command. This should > > be fixed. > > I would propose that the function be removed entirely.
Agreed. > > > And I have some curious error messages from appchk: > > > > I get for all applications: > > - section .sbss is not in the LSB > > When did .sbss get added? What does it do? It's not documented anywhere. I don't know. I use glibc 2.2 and gcc 2.95.2: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/src/cvs/LSB/src/tests > appchk/appchk /bin/more Symbol dcgettext used, but not part of LSB Symbol dcgettext has version GLIBC_2.0 expecting .bss Symbol setupterm used, but not part of LSB Symbol fopen has version GLIBC_2.1 expecting section .sbss is not in the LSB > > Then I sometimes get the message that a Symbol has version number > > GLIBC_2.2, but GLIBC_2.1 is expected (for example for __xstat64). > > This is an interesting result. Is this the only symbol the gives this message? In the moment I know of (using gcc 2.95.3 and glibc 2.2.2): readdir64 __xstat64 __fxstat64 getrlimit64 setrlimit64 has version GLIBC_2.1 expecting .bss mkstemp64 > > I often also get the message, that symbol GLIBC_2.0 was found, > > but .bss was expecting. > > I think I fixed that last week. Do you have the latest version of the lsbdev > package? I have lsbdev-0.7.3-1.i386.rpm >From lsblibchk, I got: shellWidgetClass in libX11.so.6 is missing. I cannot find this function in libX11.so.6 from XFree86 4.0.2 and 4.0.3. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse, cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
