On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:44:51AM -0400, Stuart Anderson wrote: > > SUS, but the behavior is one I would classify as "broken", so I'm reticent > > to code this broken behavior into the spec as "differences". > > > > Do I have to put these items into the spec as "differences" or is there > > some more appropriate label I can put on these issues? > > What about a non-normative footnote that points out these "bugs".
If these are not just bugs on certain distros then I think the differences should be listed in the spec proper, perhaps with a non-normative footnote stating we think the behaviour is a bug and ISV's should try to avoid using the features if possible as it may change in the future. Dale - do you think you could chase up with the upstream author to find out if the current behaviour is intentional? Regards, Chris. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
