On Thu, 3 May 2001, Johannes Poehlmann wrote: > Answer to Flavio Veloso, Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:11:43PM -0300. > > Quote from LSB Chapter 4.1: "Large Software packages must not use > a direct subdirectory under /usr". This is soft wording as you can > always begin to discuss what is "Large". > > On the other hand, your posting made me double check with the sample > implementation and I found out, that the minimal-runtime part of the > sample implementation uses > /usr/lib/lsb/ and > /lib/lsb/ > > _Bummer_ > > So we have to decide between two locations and I would say both > are ok from a technical point of view (Experts cry now, please!). > > So we should perhaps use the more LSB aware locations /usr/lib/lsb/ > and/or /lib/lsb/.
I would stick with /usr/lib/lsb. Let's keep the root partition small (cf. FHS) and also the interface files will be needed only when /usr is mounted anyway (you need a linker). -- Flávio
