On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Theodore Tso wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 05:00:50 -0400 > From: Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brad_Brech/Rochester/[EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael_Day/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED], > Ron_Clark/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED], George_Kraft/Austin/[EMAIL > PROTECTED], > Paul_McKenney/Beaverton/[EMAIL PROTECTED], > Kenneth_Rozendal/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED], > Satya_Sharma/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL > PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: PROPOSED: 32/64 bit coexistance > Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:02:12 +0200 > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:34:50AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > > * /lib: consistent scheme for all 32bit systems and x86-64, > > sparc64, ppc64, zSeries (s390x). > > > > * iA64 today has a 32bit emulation mode, but 64bit is the > > (only) favored one; Alpha is too long established. (64bit > > libs will go to /lib) > > > > Does Sparc/Ultrasparc use /lib and /lib64? Or will this be a change > for the Ultrasparc platform? Actually userspace for ultrasparc is only 32 bits, there is a 64 bit compiler for the kernel, I think, but I've never seeen 64 bits libraries except the ones inside of /usr/lib/gcc-lib/<sprac>/<egcs-xxx>.
Luigi
