On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > "An LSB conforming application must adhere to the FHS2.2"
> >
> > to make it plain that they are expected to adhere to the
> > requirements for applications within FHS 2.2 , use of /opt
> > and placement of application files.
> >
> > comments?
>
> There are real world situations where the the FHS 2.2 has to be treated as
> advisory. Eg there are many large web set ups where its view point on where
> to stick web pages simply isnt appropriate. People know that the FHS authors
> expect the FHS to be violated in such areas when appropriate and you need
> to be careful that its not an absolute rule
Could this be generalized to a statement that allows certain concession to
local administration policies? Would it be OK to allow an app to read from
a broader area than it is allowed to write?
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Metro Link Incorporated South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way 129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500 voice: 803.951.3630
http://www.metrolink.com/ XFree86 Core Team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
