Matt Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 06:45:23PM +0200, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando wrote:
Matt Wilson wrote:
If you're talking about including KDE in the LSB, yes - this lack of
C++ ABI stability will block any C++ library from being included in
the LSB.
Matt ... Do you have any example about this ?
May this lacks be solved? ... Or is a theorical C++ problem without
solutions ?
The solution to the C++ problem is for vendors to adopt
soon-to-be-released GCC 3.1 as their system compiler. The LSB will be
adopting "The V3 multi-vendor standard C++ ABI" that GCC 3.1
implements.
If it's just blocking for a short time, no problem. So please ignore my
previous messages.
Even once the C++ ABI is included, KDE still has a major blocking
issue in the Qt QPL license. The LSB is designed to provide a
platform for software developers to use without restriction or
licensing fees for any use whatsoever. Unfortunately the QPL does not
provide that facility to LSB Applications.
rpm -qi libqt2-2.3.1-29mdk
Name : libqt2 Relocations: (not relocateable)
(...)
License: GPL & QPL
G.
--
< Gaƫl DUVAL - Founder Mandrake Linux >
< Co-Founder, Mandrakesoft SA, Mandrakesoft Inc. >
< Mandrake: http://mandrake.com http://mandrakesoft.com >
< Perso: http://indidea.org/gael/ >
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]