Previously Andrew Josey wrote: > We should not be expecting any distributions to pass the current version > of the test suite. Although we believe it to be a fair and accurate test of > the > LSB FHS 2.1 specification, there are issues with the specification and tests > that need to be resolved.
Indeed; I explicitly said so. I wish SuSE mentioned that in their press release as well though. In fact I expect that the test results get worse once work progresses.. certainly things like lsb scripts and modifications to uname aren't done yet or tested for. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
