Seems reasonable. Any objections? George (gk4)
Doug Beattie wrote: > > Will this be waivered too then for this release? > > Doug > > George Kraft IV wrote: > > > > We cannot drop it until v2.0; therefore, change the documentation to say > > that it > > will be depreciated. > > > > George (gk4) > > "Wichmann, Mats D" wrote: > > > > > > The recent sense of a discussion on another list was that > > > login should be ditched entirely. > > > > > > I don't know that there was a formal decision made. > > > > > > Mats > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Andrew Josey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:12 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: /bin/login VSX test fails when permissions are secure > > > > > > > > > > > > Randy > > > > (this is the LSB-FHS testset) > > > > I have cc'd this to the lsb-test list for comment. This seems > > > > sensible and a possible reason to waive the test, but perhaps > > > > there is a > > > > need for users to be able to invoke login directly? > > > > regards > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > George Kraft IV > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Douglas B. Beattie > ------------------ > Test Architect - Caldera, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- George Kraft IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
