Thorsten Kukuk writes: > > statically. Unfortunately this doesn't appear to work properly for > > getspnam. > > Is there any reason that getspnam is not an LSB interface? > Else, linking this tools static should be no problem, since getspnam > dlopens the nss modules and libc.
Thats what I would have thought. It ends up segfaulting down in the dlopen. I need to look at it more closely, it could possibly be a problem with lsbdev, though AFAIK everything else seems to be ok. Chris -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia
