On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:35:02AM -0600, George Kraft IV wrote: > > What the LSB has to date is the application battery which consists of Apache, > Mozilla, and Rsync. An LSB build environment should be able to build these, > and > an LSB distribution should be able to run these.
Some comments: The rsync package doesn't use the 'lsb' namespace for the package name. It does not carry the 'lsb' requirement. I suggest a versioned requirement of "lsb >= 1.0" The apache package has an odd format for the filename. It should be lsb-apache-1.3.22-1.i386.rpm (not lsb-apache_1.3.22-1_i386.rpm). Even better would be lsb-apache-1.3.22-1.i386.lsb perhaps. Mozilla doesn't have binaries yet and building mozilla requires development tools outside of the LSB. > ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/pub/lsb/app-battery/ > > I must admit that no too many people have looked/reviewed this, and we don't > have a written FVT to determine if the program is working as expected. > Perhaps > we could get a volunteer to spend a day or two on this? > > Does this sound more finite? Yes, a bit - the FVT is going to be needed of course. Cheers, Matt
