Stew Benedict writes: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > and a lot of segfaults: > > unexpected signal 11 (SIGSEGV) received > > > > Looks like nealy all stramio/freopen tests seg.faults. > > > > I will now try to compile the testsuite myself on this machine. > > > > Pretty much the same results here, many more failures than the > lsb-distribution test 0.9-2. About 40 more failures and nearly 100 more > unresolved. Also for both the last versions of the test the loop device > is not released and the machine has to be rebooted to do another run. >
I've put up lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-2.i386.rpm in ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/lsb/test_suites/beta/binary/distribution This is identical to lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm except it wasn't compiled inside lsbdev. Stew and Thorsten could you give this one a go and see if you still see the problems - this should determine whether its a problem with lsbdev (or due to the recent changes or way I'm building the rpm). At the moment there seem to be conflicting results as lsb-distribution-test-1.0-1.i386.rpm was compiled with lsbdev (which some report as ok) and others have had problems with anything after lsb-distribution-test-0.9-2.i386.rpm (the last to not use lsbdev) Chris -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia
