At 2002/3/26 10:01-0500 Joey Hess writes: > Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > So I think changing the testcase is the correct thing to do. Doing so > > results in testcase 2 reporting a PASS and does not change the results > > of any of the other testcases. > > Huh, I had hoped it would fix testcase 5 as well. Oh well, off to debug > some more.. > > Remember that the openloag_L test calls setlogmask in the same way. I'm > not sure though if fixing that fixes any testcases.
Yes, changing this for openlog_L also changes the result of "T.openlog_L 2" from FAIL to PASS. Thanks for your help! Chris -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
